Anyhow, “ letter, amount to, elegant ” is over there Yan Fu, not only it is his place importunate translates a principle one kind, it is him more what go up in culture thought is clinging: Should introduce western doctrine to want it and a traditional idea again already confluent, the frame that perhaps says to hold to what comment from traditional thought pattern and article to cover a region comes up to hold and promote new idea, do one's best with first Western learning of translate freely of Qin Guwen's syntax, model type, elucidate is classical he is opposite —— the Ji Ji of “ elegant ” is gone after actually good not only the skill that is affix literary grace, should arrive from idea kind however expression is normative strive makes ” of the body in Western learning and “ is agreed with. Say objectively, the amplification of the Western learning that this wants to travel to him is affected had positive effect.
Accordingly, the pursuit of specific thought culture that Yan Fu's interpret is written is him adds “ letter, amount to, what elegant ” translates a standard this is specific reflect, also be the successful practice of its interpreter principle. And this one success makes Yan Fu that is faithless, not the interpret of “ letter ” is written generated huge idea Shi Ying is noisy, but the peak of poetic perfection that they also became interpreter history to go up. More or less didn't they and the interpreter career later concern. But “ letter, amount to, the standard that the requirement of elegant ” is translated as ideal by abstract ground and accepted come down it is conveying —— the basic principle that translate freely place should follow: Accurate, clear, have literary talent. Anyhow, present interpreter home people won't regard the example that carries out this principle as Yan Yi.

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13Next

Previous:The expert talks about an interpreter " 8 give up "
Next：The regulation in written translation